|
|
Why Missile Defense Won't Work
Even if the missile defense system were to function perfectly during tests, it doesn't mean that it would work in the real world. A good example of this is the Patriot theatre defense system.
Most ballistic missiles possessed by nations hostile to the US are called "theater" ballistic missiles because of their shorter range - 30 to 3,000 kilometers (19 to 1,864 miles). The Patriot was designed to protect US troops from these threats, destroying or deflecting a missile by exploding an interceptor nearby. The Patriot succeeded in all 17 of its tests. However, when it was used during the Gulf War to destroy Iraqi Scud missiles, it failed in most or all of its Scud engagements even though the enemy employed no obvious counter-measures. Unexpected maneuvers and breakups of Iraqi Scud missiles in the Persian Gulf War thwarted the U.S. Patriot missiles' ability to destroy them. Before the war, Patriot (above-left) was successful in all tests was against ballistic-missile targets, which flew on stable, smooth trajectories. Aside from non-perfect launches, other, deliberate, ways of foiling the defense system are available. Overwhelm the defense
Hinder warhead identification
Hinder warhead detection
Prevent the interceptor from hitting the warhead
Even though missile defense probably won't work technically, one crucial argument remains: that the presence of a missile defense shield would deter non-nuclear countries from pursuing nuclear weapons, since they would think that they wouldn't be able to penetrate the shield and actually use them. Another argument - for the other side - is that nuclear countries like Russia, China, and North Korea, would feel threatened by the defense shield and would build up nuclear weapons to make sure that they would be able to overwhelm it.
|